Soda_Jerk's site is here.
October 14, 2012
Soda_Jerk Re- Copyright
June 10, 2012
Robert Cauble's Guy Debord
A little long, but a wonderful ride; via notbored.org.
January 22, 2012
Clay Shirky on PIPA and SOPA
Excellent overview of where these bills are coming from and what we should expect going forward, at TED.
March 19, 2010
Viacom Suing YouTube for Allowing Viacom to Infringe Itself
For years, Viacom continuously and secretly uploaded its content to YouTube, even while publicly complaining about its presence there. It hired no fewer than 18 different marketing agencies to upload its content to the site. It deliberately "roughed up" the videos to make them look stolen or leaked. It opened YouTube accounts using phony email addresses. It even sent employees to Kinko's to upload clips from computers that couldn't be traced to Viacom. And in an effort to promote its own shows, as a matter of company policy Viacom routinely left up clips from shows that had been uploaded to YouTube by ordinary users. Executives as high up as the president of Comedy Central and the head of MTV Networks felt "very strongly" that clips from shows like The Daily Show and The Colbert Report should remain on YouTube.Posted by Zahavah Levine, YouTube Chief Counsel, at Broadcasting Ourselves; more worthwhile info at the link.
Viacom's efforts to disguise its promotional use of YouTube worked so well that even its own employees could not keep track of everything it was posting or leaving up on the site. As a result, on countless occasions Viacom demanded the removal of clips that it had uploaded to YouTube, only to return later to sheepishly ask for their reinstatement. In fact, some of the very clips that Viacom is suing us over were actually uploaded by Viacom itself.
Given Viacom’s own actions, there is no way YouTube could ever have known which Viacom content was and was not authorized to be on the site. But Viacom thinks YouTube should somehow have figured it out. The legal rule that Viacom seeks would require YouTube -- and every Web platform -- to investigate and police all content users upload, and would subject those web sites to crushing liability if they get it wrong.
October 29, 2009
Amazon Patent$ Method to $ystematically Maim Text$
Per Slashdot, Amazon's method calls for "'programmatically substituting synonyms into . . . books, short stories, . . . reviews, news articles, editorial articles, technical papers, scholastic papers, and so on' in an effort to uniquely identify customers who redistribute material. In its description . . . Amazon also touts the use of 'alternative misspellings for selected words' as a way to provide 'evidence of copyright infringement in a legal action.'"
September 5, 2009
Feud Between Hirst & Teen Artist Escalates Over Pencils?
Per the UK Telegraph and The Independent, the pencils, from Hirst's Pharmacy installation, are allegedly worth £500,000 and were kidnapped by the teen, Cartrain, as part of an effort to obtain the return of the teen's artworks, collages that included images of Hirst's For the Love of God.
According to The Independent, "Hirst reported [Cartrain] to the Design and Artists Copyright Society and a string of legal letters were sent to [his] art dealer, Tom Cuthbert, at 100artworks.com, about the teenager's pieces, also called For the Love of God. The online gallery surrendered them to Hirst with a verbal apology." [Emphasis supplied.]
As of this writing, however, 100artworks.com is still offering several of the offending collages for sale; in fact, in its description of the piece at left, the dealer provides a link to an earlier article in The Independent concerning Hirst's supposed objections to the work.
UPDATE: The New York Times reports that Cartrain and his father have been arrested.